16 Tuesday Oct 2012
Posted in Wine reviews
With plenty of cellar time, this wine is showing nicely. Slightly subdued nose of blueberry meets a sweet dust gives way to a typical Bordeaux-style palate. Blueberry, cassis and some leather co-mingle with ripe tannins to produce a tasty wine that is at its peak. Drink up to 2017, alongside a Ribeye steak as the tannins will meld well with a streaky cut of beef. 3 stars, 87 points.
06 Saturday Oct 2012
Posted in Wine reviews
Tags
I found this ’06 vintage Cru Bourgeois hiding next to some newer wines. With 6 years of age, it drinks smoothly-starting with dark blue fruits and a tannic grip. It’s still a little young, with some hope for further mellowing and some further development. It’s nothing special, yet interesting in its own sharpish way. 3 stars, 86 points
22 Saturday Sep 2012
Posted in Wine reviews
Yup, two vintages in one blog post- by accident. My local shop was running a BOGO on this wine. I am a little leery when shops are giving wine away at half price, a sure sign of it’s inability to sell. However, my goal is to taste every thing in this particular shop (not a huge selection mind you). So, I picked up my two bottles of Latour Camblanes and a bottle of Shiraz. When I arrived at the tasting site, I retrieved all the bottles from my bag and noticed that one of them had a green top on the capsule. Upon further investigation, the labels looked slightly different. I then realized that the staff had placed the 2009 vintage behind the 2008 and the SKU’s must have registered as the same item. I had paid full price for the 2008 and got the 2009 for free- as advertised. I was excited to perform a mini-vertical tasting and proceeded to open both bottles. I started with ’08 and realized my worst fears. The wine needed to be given away at half price, it was just shabby. No flavor profile, very little tannin and generally flat. Yuck. On to the 2009, not so. Cherry and tobacco, some edgy tannins and a crisp acidity made me come back for more. I did not drink any more of the 2008 because I believe strongly that life is too short to drink crappy wine. My drunk friend didn’t care and proceeded to polish it off for us, leaving the far better ’09 for me to ponder and enjoy. In a nutshell, 2009 was a far superior vintage in Bordeaux and this point was highlighted in our little tasting. I would imagine the ’08 was a combination of poorly made wine in an average vintage versus a little more effort put into a far better vintage. It’s a shame really because I am now poisoned by this brand. I will not take a chance on their wine, knowing that they did not perform in an average year and relied on nature to help them out in an excellent year. 2008 1 star and 80 points. 2009 3 stars and 85 points. Would I buy again? Nope.
17 Monday Sep 2012
Posted in Wine reviews
15.4% alcohol, do you really need to do that? Having said that, I find no heat and am enjoying the essence of fruit. Wild cherries on the nose translate into strawberry and bing cherry on the palate.
This wine has typicity at the expense of finesse. I like it’s taste, but find the alcohol offensive. A medium term wine, drink until 2016 .
3 stars but a generous 90 points on the pro scale. If they can get a lower alcohol and maintain the flavor, this wine has potential.
06 Monday Aug 2012
Posted in Wine reviews
I remembered drinking this wine before, and had to look it up here. This version, the 2010, was far better than the ’09. Fruity on the nose, the initial palate is ‘in-your-face’ with the Malbec. This grape can be very fruit-bomby and this winery has not strayed far from the hallmark. Plum and vanilla give way to a decent finish. I would not consider this a very sophisticated wine, but am warming up to it’s potential as a party quaffer. For the price, it gets 3 stars. My guess would be an 87 point wine.
19 Thursday Jul 2012
Posted in Wine reviews
Tags
Walk into any high-end steak house and this wine will be on the list. No doubt a quintessential California Cabernet from Napa Valley, I have high hopes for this one, but am concerned about its youth. Here goes.
Donkey? Earth? Not sure, but this nose is intriguing the hell out of me. Help…..
On the palate, a strong wine, and way too young. The tannins are good, but not overpowering, which allows the plummy taste to come through with some blueberry. I cannot make out any hint of imbalance, this is a well crafted wine, and the alcohol is non-intrusive. I think it’s a good wine, probably just a little too ordinary for me. For the buck, not enough bang unfortunately. I am torn between 4 stars for quality and 3 stars for its QPR. Being a rather pricy offering, I would cellar two or three bottles for at least five years, perhaps patience will be rewarded. Even though I may pass on this, I think it is worthy of 90 points.
27 Wednesday Jun 2012
Posted in Wine reviews
Look at the label carefully people.
We’ve all had Freixenet sparkling wine, the Brut in the black bottle. Did you know they also make a red wine? Neither did I. Look closer at the picture, it’s a Spanish wine with a German label that I bought in Asia. Made from Tempranillo grapes and very reasonably priced, this is what we call “cheap-and-nasty”. If you are looking for a very basic red wine that you can swill at a party, this one may fit the bill. However, I have a rule- life is too short to drink shitty wine. So, think about what you want to accomplish if you buy this wine. It tastes like wine, smells like wine, looks like wine and will get you drunk like wine. It offers nothing in the complexity department, no tannins to see it through the rest of the month, and no finish whatsoever. Having thrashed it, I will now sing its praises. It’s not out of balance, sour, weird or bad tasting. I will however give it 3 stars, simply because it gets the job done on such a low budget price. Besides, when your having a massive party and everyone is hammered, who cares? 80 Points….
07 Thursday Jun 2012
Posted in Wine reviews
A Bordeaux Superieur from the 2008 vintage, this wine is a blend of Merlot and Cabernet Sauvignon that is now hitting its stride. Very heavy on the Merlot, it has a certain flavor profile that I don’t particularly care for, but is generally a decent wine. Red fruits on the nose don’t really translate to the palate, perhaps because the blend is too heavy on Merlot. I didn’t notice any imbalance and the tannic structure is ok. Not for long term aging, this wine is a good drinking wine that is relatively low in alcohol and acidity. For the price, I would give this a 3 star rating and guess at 85 points. Nothing special, just ok.
